001     280235
005     20250831001812.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2168
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:40350057
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 1098-3015
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1524-4733
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:177406360
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2025-00913
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Bailey, Cate
|b 0
245 _ _ |a The Psychometric Performance of the EQ Health and Wellbeing in Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2025
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1754897507_31919
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a generic instrument recently developed for use in economic evaluations across public health and social care, including impacts on caregivers. Providing informal care to a person living with dementia can significantly affect the health and well-being of carers. However, it is unclear to what extent the EQ-HWB can capture such impacts. We aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB compared with other available instruments in caregivers of persons living with dementia.An online survey included demographics, informal care-related questions, and quality-of-life measures suitable for caregivers (C-DEMQOL and CarerQol) and the 25-item EQ-HWB. We used the UK pilot value set for the index scores for the EQ-HWB-S (9-item short form). The psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S were assessed in terms of acceptability (missing data), response distribution, known-groups validity analysis using t tests and one-way ANOVAs (Cohen's d and Eta squared for effect size), convergent validity (Spearman correlations), and an exploration of dimensionality using exploratory factor analysis.In known-group validity analysis, the EQ-HWB instruments performed similarly to the C-DEMQOL in terms of effect sizes across a range of variables and slightly better than the CarerQol on some variables. At the item level, 13 of the 25 items could discriminate respondents by caregiving time and 23 of 25 items by caregivers' general self-reported health. Most hypothesized correlations in the convergent validity analysis were found to be above 0.3.Our results suggest that the EQ-HWB instruments performed well in this population.
536 _ _ |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|c POF4-353
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de
650 _ 7 |a EQ-HWB
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a caregivers
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a persons living with dementia
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a psychometric performance
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a validation study
|2 Other
650 _ 2 |a Humans
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Psychometrics
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Caregivers: psychology
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Male
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Female
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Dementia: therapy
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Dementia: psychology
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Quality of Life
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Middle Aged
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Aged
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Surveys and Questionnaires
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Reproducibility of Results
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Adult
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a United Kingdom
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Aged, 80 and over
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Health Status
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Peasgood, Tessa
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Michalowsky, Bernhard
|0 P:(DE-2719)2810763
|b 2
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Engel, Lidia
|b 3
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2168
|g Vol. 28, no. 8, p. 1221 - 1230
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2011039-X
|n 8
|p 1221 - 1230
|t Value in health
|v 28
|y 2025
|x 1098-3015
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/280235/files/DZNE-2025-00913.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/280235/files/DZNE-2025-00913%20SUP.zip
856 4 _ |u https://pub.dzne.de/record/280235/files/DZNE-2025-00913.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:280235
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-2719)2810763
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b VALUE HEALTH : 2022
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-20
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)5000067
|k AG Michalowsky
|l Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health Economics Research
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)5000067
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21