% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Costello:281788,
author = {Costello, Emmet and De Vocht, Joke and Beswick, Emily and
Mac Domhnaill, Éanna and Peelo, Colm and Foucher, Juliette
and Mayberry, Emily J and Chiwera, Theresa and Hiemstra,
Fenna and Caravaca Puchades, Alejandro and Iazzolino,
Barbara and Palumbo, Francesca and Alves, Inês and Kasper,
Elisabeth and Galvin, Miriam and Heverin, Mark and Ingre,
Caroline and Mcdermott, Christopher J and Shaw, Pamela and
Al-Chalabi, Ammar and Van Den Berg, Leonard H and Povedano
Panadés, Mónica and Chiò, Adriano and Carvalho, Mamede De
and Bencheikh, Sofiane and Corcia, Philippe and Mouzouri,
Mohammed and Hermann, Andreas and Abrahams, Sharon and
Pender, Niall and Van Damme, Philip and Hardiman, Orla},
title = {{N}europsychological assessment practices in
{PRECISION}-{ALS}: challenges and opportunities for
harmonization.},
journal = {Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis $\&$ frontotemporal
degeneration},
volume = {26},
number = {7-8},
issn = {2167-8421},
address = {Abingdon},
publisher = {Taylor Francis Group},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-01181},
pages = {748 - 757},
year = {2025},
abstract = {To gather comprehensive insights regarding current
neuropsychological assessment practices in PRECISION-ALS, a
pan-European research and industry consortium, to propose
areas which can be harmonized and facilitate more robust
cross-country comparisons.Representatives from PRECISION-ALS
sites were surveyed with a semi-structured interview,
gathering information on how people with ALS are assessed
for cognitive/behavioral change, including how they are
initially screened, classified as impaired/unimpaired, and
followed up longitudinally. Assessment practices across
PRECISION-ALS sites were summarized using descriptive
analysis.Ten of the eleven PRECISION-ALS sites perform
cognitive and/or behavioral screening at least once during
the course of the disease, using the Edinburgh Cognitive and
Behavioral ALS Screen, either for clinical or research
purposes. All centers categorize impairment, but differ how
it is defined, with some using local norms, and others using
other countries' norms. Most sites account for age and
education, but differ in how these factors are considered.
Longitudinal protocols vary in terms of the number of
assessments, time intervals, and use of alternative
versions. Behavioral screening is more consistently
implemented, with the ECAS caregiver interview as the
standard tool, however there is a lack of clarity in how
this data is applied. Many sites supplement cognitive and
behavioral screening with additional measures of mood and/or
neuropsychiatric symptoms.These findings illustrate areas of
commonality and divergence in neuropsychological screening
practices. Site-specific variations are likely to confound
research involving cross-country data-sharing.
PRECISION-ALS, in generating prospective population-based
datasets, will provide agreed harmonized protocols for
neuropsychological assessment across participating sites.},
keywords = {Humans / Neuropsychological Tests: standards / Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis: psychology / Amyotrophic Lateral
Sclerosis: diagnosis / Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis:
complications / Male / Longitudinal Studies / Female /
Cognitive Dysfunction: diagnosis / Cognitive Dysfunction:
etiology / Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Other) / Cognition
(Other) / ECAS (Other) / behaviour (Other)},
cin = {AG Teipel / AG Hermann},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1510100 / I:(DE-2719)1511100},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40689468},
doi = {10.1080/21678421.2025.2527877},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/281788},
}