001     281826
005     20251113124306.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200319
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:41143127
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC12552056
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2025-01207
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Muccioli, Lorenzo
|0 0000-0001-6827-0099
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker of Disease Progression in Lafora Disease.
260 _ _ |a Minneapolis, Minn.
|c 2025
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1763033946_32671
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Lafora disease (LD) is a severe, ultra-rare childhood-onset progressive myoclonus epilepsy caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in either EPM2A or NHLRC1 and currently without cure. Body fluid-derived biomarkers have remained largely unexplored in LD. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in serum (sNfL) and CSF (cNfL) reflect ongoing neurodegeneration and have been established as prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers in various neurologic disorders. In this study, we assessed the utility of NfL as a biomarker of LD in a multicenter cohort of patients with LD.We conducted cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements of NfL levels in serum (n = 32) and CSF (n = 25) samples from a cohort of 31 patients with LD (26 independent families; mean age 21 years; age range 10.2-40.3; f:m = 16:15; EPM2A:NHLRC1 = 16:15) at diverse disease stages (median LD stage 2) and age-matched control participants with transient minor neurologic conditions (mean age 21.9 years; age range 11.1-41.3; f:m 22:8), treated at 3 referral centers in Ulm, Bologna, and Dallas. At each visit, we assessed LD stage (median LD stage 2; range 0-4) and LD clinical performance score (median score 10.5; range 0-18), allowing for correlation with NfL measurements.When compared with control participants (mean sNfL 7.72, 95% CI 6.79-8.65; mean cNfL 306.8, 95% CI 251.5-362.2), CSF and serum NfL levels were increased in patients with LD (mean sNfL 13.95, 95% CI 11.20-16.69; mean cNfL 576.9, 95% CI 465.3-688.5). cNfL values exhibited less variability than sNfL, resulting in superior discriminatory performance between those with LD and controls in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses (AUC sNfL = 0.80; cNfL = 0.88). NfL levels tended to increase longitudinally when samples had been collected ≥12 months after baseline. sNfL levels correlated with both disease stage (r = 0.56) and LD Clinical Performance Scale score (r = -0.49), but not with disease duration (owing to genotype-dependent clinical heterogeneity).Our findings support the utility of NfL, particularly sNfL, as a promising biomarker of disease progression in LD. While further research is needed to fully elucidate the potential of NfL in this context, it holds immediate promise as an exploratory outcome measure in ongoing and future clinical trials.
536 _ _ |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|c POF4-353
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de
700 1 _ |a Ganceviciute, Bazile
|0 0009-0002-3231-8622
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Becker, Felicitas
|0 0009-0000-2577-5580
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Minardi, Raffaella
|0 0000-0002-8190-8517
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Tappatà, Maria
|0 0000-0002-3397-6996
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Bachhuber, Franziska
|0 0000-0003-1031-9966
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Alkhatib, Mahmoud
|0 0000-0002-8294-8000
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Cirak, Sebahattin
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Weishaupt, Jochen H
|0 P:(DE-2719)9000455
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Verma, Mayank
|0 0000-0003-0167-0842
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Tumani, Hayrettin
|0 P:(DE-2719)9002007
|b 10
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Wagner, Jan
|0 0000-0002-0459-8885
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Messahel, Souad
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Nitschke, Felix
|0 0000-0002-1118-2693
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Minassian, Berge A
|0 0000-0002-9322-0189
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Bisulli, Francesca
|0 0000-0002-1109-7296
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Brenner, David
|0 P:(DE-2719)9002137
|b 16
|e Last author
773 _ _ |a 10.1212/NXG.0000000000200319
|g Vol. 11, no. 6, p. e200319
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2818607-2
|n 6
|p e200319
|t Neurology / Genetics
|v 11
|y 2025
|x 2376-7839
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/281826/files/DZNE-2025-01207.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/281826/files/DZNE-2025-01207.pdf?subformat=pdfa
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-2719)9000455
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-2719)9002007
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 16
|6 P:(DE-2719)9002137
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEUROL-GENET : 2022
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2021-02-13T18:57:06Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2021-02-13T18:57:06Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2021-02-13T18:57:06Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2025-01-07
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2025-01-07
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)5000077
|k Clinical Study Center (Ulm)
|l Clinical Study Center (Ulm)
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)5000077
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21