% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Teckentrup:281873,
author = {Teckentrup, Vanessa and Ludwig, Mareike and Seibt, Janis
and Hartig, Renée and Preissl, Hubert and Schuppert, Mark
and Avdievich, Nikolai I and Scheffler, Klaus and
Priovoulos, Nikos and Ehses, Maik and Poser, Benedikt A and
Wiggins, Christopher J and Trautner, Peter and Honerbach,
Walter and Jacobs, Heidi I L and Speck, Oliver and
Hämmerer, Dorothea and Kroemer, Nils B},
title = {{A}ssessing a {S}timulator {M}odification for
{S}imultaneous {N}oninvasive {A}uricular {V}agus {N}erve
{S}timulation and {MRI}.},
journal = {Journal of neuroimaging},
volume = {35},
number = {6},
issn = {1051-2284},
address = {Berlin [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-01244},
pages = {e70098},
year = {2025},
abstract = {The vagus nerve can be stimulated noninvasively at the ear
using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation
(taVNS). Concurrent functional MRI (fMRI) permits study of
taVNS-induced changes in brain dynamics, a key requisite for
precision neurostimulation. However, there is no
standardized protocol for how to safely apply taVNS during
MRI. One major risk is temperature increase exceeding
innocuous thresholds due to coupling of the emitted radio
frequency (RF) pulse during imaging. Thus, we developed and
tested a stimulator cable configuration with floating ground
cable traps and filter plate connectors.We measured
temperature, resonance of the stimulation electrodes, and
current interference using unmodified and modified
stimulation cables. Measurements were conducted across three
sites using different 3T MRI scanner models, stimulators,
and stimulation strengths with phantoms and human
participants.The modified compared to the unmodified cable
considerably reduced RF heating as the relative temperature
increase stayed well below the 2 K threshold specified by
the ASTM F2182 standard. Additionally, in accordance with
ASTM 2119, we can rule out potential distortion and signal
loss around the electrodes due to current flow from the
stimulator and demonstrate that impaired image quality in
brainstem and midbrain regions is recovered using the
modified cable.We show that adding floating ground cable
traps to the stimulator cable allows the safe use of taVNS
with fMRI and may improve image quality in functional
imaging. To enable other researchers to modify their
hardware in the same way, we provide details of the
modifications.},
subtyp = {Review Article},
keywords = {Humans / Magnetic Resonance Imaging: methods / Magnetic
Resonance Imaging: instrumentation / Vagus Nerve
Stimulation: instrumentation / Vagus Nerve Stimulation:
methods / Equipment Design / Phantoms, Imaging / Male /
Female / Adult / Vagus Nerve: physiology / Transcutaneous
Electric Nerve Stimulation: instrumentation / Brain:
physiology / Brain: diagnostic imaging / MRI (Other) / RF
(Other) / electrical stimulation (Other) / neuroimaging
(Other) / taVNS (Other) / temperature (Other) / vagus nerve
(Other)},
cin = {AG Müller / AG Düzel},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1310003 / I:(DE-2719)5000006},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41199481},
pmc = {pmc:PMC12592781},
doi = {10.1111/jon.70098},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/281873},
}