% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Halbgebauer:282577,
author = {Halbgebauer, Steffen and Fazeli, Badrieh and Klose,
Veronika and Nagel, Gabriele and Rosenbohm, Angela and
Rothenbacher, Dietrich and Bachhuber, Franziska and Jesse,
Sarah and Otto, Markus and Landwehrmeyer, Georg Bernhard and
Abdelhak, Ahmed and Petzold, Axel and Ludolph, Albert C and
Tumani, Hayrettin},
title = {{A}ge-{S}pecific {C}ontrol and {A}lzheimer {D}isease
{R}eference {C}urves and z-{S}cores for {G}lial {F}ibrillary
{A}cidic {P}rotein in {B}lood.},
journal = {Clinical chemistry},
volume = {71},
number = {12},
issn = {0009-9147},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {American Association for Clinical Chemistry},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-01337},
pages = {1234 - 1242},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a biomarker
for astrocytic injury and astrogliosis. Concentrations are
elevated in numerous neurological disorders, including a
pronounced increase in Alzheimer disease (AD). However, GFAP
levels in the serum also increase with age. Consequently,
the integration of GFAP levels into clinical routine and
their interpretation demands age-adjusted reference
values.Serum from 1273 subjects (952 noninflammatory and
nonneurodegenerative neurological controls and 321 subjects
with AD) was analyzed for GFAP using the microfluidic Ella
system. Age-dependent serum GFAP reference values were
estimated by additive quantile regression analysis and
visualized with percentiles and z-scores.AD exhibited
elevated serum GFAP levels in comparison to control patients
(P < 0.0001). This remained the case when the newly
generated age-corrected z-scores were applied (P < 0.0001).
In the control cohort, a nonlinear elevation of serum GFAP
with increasing age was observed (Spearman correlation
coefficient 0.62, $95\%$ CI 0.58-0.66, P < 0.0001). In
contrast, the AD cohort exhibited a more linear increase
(0.16, $95\%$ CI 0.05-0.26, P = 0.004). Age-dependent
cut-offs for serum GFAP were determined for different AD age
groups. The calculated areas under the curve (AUCs; 0.97)
demonstrated excellent diagnostic test performance in the
early-onset age group. This effect was less marked in the
elderly subjects (AUC 0.72).Our novel GFAP z-scores enable
the integration and interpretation of serum GFAP levels in
clinical practice, moving from the group to individual
level. They support both intra- and interindividual
interpretation of single GFAP levels in neurological
diseases with astrocytic pathology, including an accurate
discrimination of AD.},
keywords = {Humans / Alzheimer Disease: blood / Alzheimer Disease:
diagnosis / Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: blood / Aged /
Male / Female / Middle Aged / Reference Values / Biomarkers:
blood / Aged, 80 and over / Age Factors / Adult /
Case-Control Studies / Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (NLM
Chemicals) / Biomarkers (NLM Chemicals) / GFAP protein,
human (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {Clinical Study Center (Ulm) / AG Zhan},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)5000077 / I:(DE-2719)1910005},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) / 354 -
Disease Prevention and Healthy Aging (POF4-354)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-354},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41081630},
doi = {10.1093/clinchem/hvaf120},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/282577},
}