Home > Publications Database > Patient perspective and research prioritization in rehabilitation after stroke - results from an online survey in Germany. > print

001     282579
005     20251218103443.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1186/s12913-025-13824-0
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:41310672
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC12670788
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DZNE-2025-01339
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Rackoll, Torsten
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Patient perspective and research prioritization in rehabilitation after stroke - results from an online survey in Germany.
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2025
|b BioMed Central
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1764937778_11990
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a People with lived experience (pwle) of stroke including survivors and informal caregivers offer critical insights into research needs. This study aimed to identify stroke rehabilitation research priorities in Germany from the perspective of pwle, and to explore variation by age, sex, and time since stroke.A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted nationwide in Germany. The survey included closed- and open-ended questions and was distributed via stroke support organizations, clinical partners, and previous study networks. Responses were analyzed descriptively.A total of 470 individuals responded, including 305 stroke survivors and 133 informal caregivers. The most frequently selected research priorities were cognition and mobility. Participants aged ≤ 65 years emphasized cognition, while older participants more often prioritized mobility and speech. Women more frequently selected cognition, and men mobility. Participants with longer time since stroke emphasized secondary prevention. Open-text responses identified additional priorities, including social participation, sexuality, and the need for individualized therapy approaches. A small subgroup of caregivers of pediatric stroke survivors prioritized cognition, participation, and self-care. Overall, 75% of respondents expressed interest to be engaged in future research.Cognition and mobility were selected as key research priorities, with meaningful variation across demographic and clinical subgroups. These findings support the inclusion of diverse pwle perspectives in shaping national stroke research agendas and underscore the importance of tailoring rehabilitation research to stakeholder-identified needs.Not applicable.
536 _ _ |a 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|c POF4-353
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: pub.dzne.de
650 _ 7 |a Caregivers
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Germany
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Lived experience
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Patient engagement
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Rehabilitation
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Research priorities
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Stroke
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Survey
|2 Other
650 _ 2 |a Humans
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Male
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Female
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Germany
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Stroke Rehabilitation
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Aged
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Cross-Sectional Studies
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Middle Aged
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Adult
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Surveys and Questionnaires
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Caregivers: psychology
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Aged, 80 and over
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Stroke: psychology
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Internet
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Rehabilitation Research
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Ketzer, André
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Peppmeier, Bernd
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Engel, Anna
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Endres, Matthias
|0 P:(DE-2719)2811033
|b 4
|u dzne
700 1 _ |a Nave, Alexander H
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.1186/s12913-025-13824-0
|g Vol. 25, no. 1, p. 1564
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2050434-2
|n 1
|p 1564
|t BMC health services research
|v 25
|y 2025
|x 1472-6963
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/282579/files/DZNE-2025-01339.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://pub.dzne.de/record/282579/files/DZNE-2025-01339.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:pub.dzne.de:282579
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
|0 I:(DE-588)1065079516
|k DZNE
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-2719)2811033
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Neurodegenerative Diseases
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-350
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Clinical and Health Care Research
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2024-04-10T15:34:10Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2024-04-10T15:34:10Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-20
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-2719)1811005
|k AG Endres
|l Interdisciplinary Dementia Research
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-2719)1811005
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21