% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Willemse:282584,
author = {Willemse, Ilse H J and Mellone, Sabato and Tacconi, Carlo
and Santorelli, Filippo M and Ricca, Ivana and Satolli, Sara
and Klebe, Stephan and Jeschonneck, Nicole and Ilg, Winfried
and Schüle-Freyer, Rebecca and Synofzik, Matthis and
Nonnekes, Jorik and van de Warrenburg, Bart P C},
title = {{F}easibility of a smartphone application for remote use in
spastic ataxias: an 8-week long-term {PROSPAX} study.},
journal = {Journal of neurology},
volume = {273},
number = {1},
issn = {0367-004X},
address = {[Darmstadt]},
publisher = {Steinkopff},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-01344},
pages = {3},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Digital biomarkers show significant potential and are
emerging as outcome measures in clinical trials in spastic
ataxias (SPAX). Research on the performances of digital
biomarkers in home environments remains limited.To evaluate
feasibility, user adherence, time-of-day and learning
effects, and consistency across settings of the SPAX-app for
home monitoring in clinical trials. The app contains four
tasks assessing gait, standing balance, and finger and hand
movements, along with a patient-reported outcome measure
(PROM).We conducted an 8-week long-term study in 38 SPAX
patients and 10 healthy controls. Subjects first answered
the SPAX-app PROM and performed tasks during one in-clinic
session. Severity of ataxia and spasticity were assessed by
clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROs). Subjects then
performed the tasks and answered the PROM twice a week in
the morning and evening at home.The SPAX-app showed high
feasibility for finger and hand movement tasks $(92\%),$ but
limited feasibility for gait $(47\%)$ and stance $(63\%)$
tasks. Among those able to perform the tasks, adherence was
high $(81\%).$ A significant difference (p < 0.01) was found
between morning and evening assessments by PROMs in SPAX.
Results remained stable across the day and repeated
assessments, except for the inter-onset interval in finger
tapping (p = 0.002 and p = 0.020, respectively). Strong
correlations were observed between tasks performed at home
and in the clinic. Motor outcome measures correlated well
with ClinROs, but not with PROMs.The SPAX-app is a feasible
tool for remote assessment in SPAX, showing high feasibility
for finger and hand movement tasks, but limited feasibility
for gait and stance tasks at home. Time-of-day and learning
effects were minimal. Longer-term studies are needed to
assess clinical relevance.},
keywords = {Humans / Male / Female / Feasibility Studies / Middle Aged
/ Adult / Smartphone / Mobile Applications / Muscle
Spasticity: diagnosis / Muscle Spasticity: physiopathology /
Aged / Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Longitudinal
Studies / Postural Balance: physiology / Young Adult /
Digital biomarkers (Other) / Long-term study (Other) /
Remote monitoring (Other) / Smartphone application (Other) /
Spastic ataxia (Other)},
cin = {AG Gasser},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1210000},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41342937},
doi = {10.1007/s00415-025-13514-1},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/282584},
}