% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Tegethoff:283065,
author = {Tegethoff, Paulina and Kurz, Carolin Isabella and Hufnagel,
Anna and Rutt, Sophia and Perneczky, Robert},
title = {{M}otivation, {W}orries and {D}igital {A}ffinity in
{A}lzheimer's {D}isease {R}esearch ‐ {Q}ualitative
{F}indings from {D}avos {A}lzheimer's {C}ollaborative},
journal = {Alzheimer's and dementia},
volume = {21},
number = {Suppl 3},
issn = {1552-5260},
reportid = {DZNE-2025-01472},
pages = {e100294},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Subjective cognitive deficits are the earliest clinical
sign of Alzheimer's disease (AD), raising interest in early
detection when disease-modifying drugs promise the greatest
benefit. The CogScreen 1 and 2 studies, part of the Davos
Alzheimer's Collaborative's Healthcare Systems Preparedness
program, evaluate tools for community-based screening for AD
in the earliest clinical stages. During the studies, a
systematic investigation of participant motivations,
concerns, and suggestions for trial improvement emerged as
essential.A qualitative interview guide was developed and
applied in 30 telephone interviews with randomly assigned
former participants. Recorded and transcribed data were
analyzed using the MAXQDA software (VERBI Software),
employing an inductive-deductive coding guide. Thematic
content analysis identified key patterns and insights into
the motivation, concerns and digital affinity of
participants in an AD research study.The study uncovered
valuable perspective on Alzheimer´s research. Participants
revealed diverse motivations for involvement, ranging from
personal connections to dementia to aspirations for early
diagnosis and treatment. Reactions to potential diagnoses
ranged from shock and grief to proactive care strategies.
Digital affinity varied but showed encouraging levels of
familiarity with technology among older adults. Participants
raised concerns about the study design, including item
clarity and response scales, as well as suggestions for
improving digital and traditional tools.By systematically
capturing participant feedback, the CogScreen study provides
critical insights for improving AD research methodologies,
particularly in relation to the participatory nature of
research. These findings underline the importance of
addressing participants' motivations and fears while
integrating innovative tools. The results also highlight the
feasibility of digital interventions in ageing populations
and emphasize trust in public institutions. Future studies
should use these findings to refine early detection
approaches and encourage greater participant engagement.},
month = {Jul},
date = {2025-07-27},
organization = {Alzheimer’s Association
International Conference, Toronto
(Canada), 27 Jul 2025 - 31 Jul 2025},
keywords = {Humans / Alzheimer Disease: diagnosis / Alzheimer Disease:
psychology / Male / Female / Aged / Motivation / Aged, 80
and over / Middle Aged / Qualitative Research / Interviews
as Topic / Cognitive Dysfunction: diagnosis},
cin = {AG Dichgans},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)5000022},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41446930},
pmc = {pmc:PMC12739507},
doi = {10.1002/alz70857_100294},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/283065},
}