% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Walders:285258,
author = {Walders, Julia and Wetz, Sophie and Costa, Ana Sofia and
Hofmann, Anna and Schulz, Jörg B and Reetz, Kathrin and
Dadsena, Ravi},
title = {{L}ongitudinal modeling of {P}ost-{COVID}-19 condition over
three years: {A} machine learning approach using clinical,
neuropsychological, and fluid markers.},
journal = {Scientific reports},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
issn = {2045-2322},
address = {[London]},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
reportid = {DZNE-2026-00200},
pages = {6517},
year = {2026},
abstract = {Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) manifests with prolonged,
heterogeneous symptoms challenging both, diagnosis and
therapeutic management. This three-year longitudinal study
analyzed data from 93 adults (mean age of 48.9 ± 14.0, 60
female) after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Every
follow-up visit included clinical, neuropsychological, and
laboratory assessments, capturing multidimensional
indicators of patient health. A machine learning framework
was implemented to classify temporal stage of patient health
status, identify visit-specific predictive markers, and
manage incomplete data using both native handling in
tree-based models and explicit imputation techniques.
Gradient boosting methods consistently achieved the best
performance across all visit comparisons, achieving
F1-scores close to or above $90\%.$ Classification
performance improved with greater time intervals between
visits, suggesting progressive divergence in patient
phenotypes over time. For discriminating follow-up stages,
inflammatory markers emerged as the most informative
predictors, followed by SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and
neuropsychiatric measures for fatigue and cognitive
performance. Interpretability analyses using SHAP and LIME
confirmed the contribution of these features, while
revealing shifts in feature relevance across years. These
findings highlight the utility of machine learning in
characterizing follow-up stage separability in PCC and offer
clinically interpretable insights that prioritize immune and
neuropsychological measures for monitoring and
risk-stratified follow-up.},
keywords = {Humans / Machine Learning / COVID-19: complications /
COVID-19: psychology / Female / Middle Aged / Longitudinal
Studies / Male / Biomarkers / Adult / SARS-CoV-2: isolation
$\&$ purification / Neuropsychological Tests / Aged /
Clinical biomarkers (Other) / Long COVID-19 (Other) /
Longitudinal data (Other) / Machine learning (Other) /
Predictive modeling (Other) / Biomarkers (NLM Chemicals)},
cin = {AG Jucker},
ddc = {600},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1210001},
pnm = {352 - Disease Mechanisms (POF4-352)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-352},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41690938},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-37635-3},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/285258},
}