% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Buchholz:285349,
author = {Buchholz, Maresa and Engel, Lidia and Xie, Feng and
Michalowsky, Bernhard},
title = {{E}xamining the face validity of the {EQ}-{HWB}-9 in
dementia: caregiver interpretation across '{T}oday' and
'7-{D}ay' recall periods.},
journal = {Health and quality of life outcomes},
volume = {24},
number = {1},
issn = {1477-7525},
address = {London},
publisher = {BioMed Central},
reportid = {DZNE-2026-00215},
pages = {22},
year = {2026},
abstract = {This study aimed to assess the face validity of the EQ
Health and Wellbeing 9 (EQ-HWB-9) for use as a proxy by
informal caregivers of community-dwelling people living with
dementia (PlwD). It explored how caregivers understand and
interpret the EQ-HWB-9 items when using two different recall
periods (today vs. 7-days).Qualitative interviews were
conducted with 73 informal caregivers of PlwD in Germany.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two recall
period groups of the EQ-HWB-9 ('today' vs. '7 days'), and
underwent an interview, designed to evaluate the
appropriateness of the EQ-HWB-9. Interviews were
audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using
qualitative content analysis.Caregivers were, on average,
70.6 years old and mainly female $(72.6\%).$ Most caregivers
found the EQ-HWB-9 acceptable, highlighting its broad health
coverage, clear structure, and suitability of the five-point
response scale. Criticisms included the brevity and
insufficient depth to capture the PlwD's health status
fully. Caregivers tended to focus on observable aspects,
such as daily activities, concentration, and mobility, while
internal states, like loneliness, sadness, and anxiety, were
more challenging to assess, often relying on indirect cues.
The 7-day recall period was associated with lower adherence
and more frequent deviations from recall instructions
compared to the 'Today' recall. Overall, caregivers adhered
well to the instructed proxy-proxy perspective but reported
uncertainty in selecting the most appropriate responses.The
EQ-HWB-9 is generally acceptable and feasible for proxy
assessments in PlwD. However, challenges regarding recall
periods, proxy interpretation, and response certainty
require further investigation.},
keywords = {Humans / Female / Caregivers: psychology / Dementia:
psychology / Male / Aged / Middle Aged / Mental Recall /
Germany / Reproducibility of Results / Qualitative Research
/ Surveys and Questionnaires: standards / Interviews as
Topic / Quality of Life: psychology / Aged, 80 and over /
Activities of Daily Living / Psychometrics / Health Status /
Dementia (Other) / EQ-HWB-9 (Other) / Health fluctuations
(Other) / Informal caregivers (Other) / Proxy-proxy
perspective (Other)},
cin = {AG Michalowsky},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)5000067},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41606591},
pmc = {pmc:PMC12924600},
doi = {10.1186/s12955-026-02478-z},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/285349},
}