% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Otten:285775,
author = {Otten, D. and Kasinger, C. and Kriechel, L. and Tibubos, A.
N. and Berger, K. and Schomerus, G. and McLaren, T. and
Beutel, M. E. and Speerforck, S. and Brähler, E.},
collaboration = {investigators, NAKO},
othercontributors = {Becher, Heiko and Bohmann, Patricia and Brenner, Hermann
and Castell, Stefanie and Fuhr, Daniela and Grabe, Hans and
Greiser, Karin Halina and Harth, Volker and Hebestreit,
Antje and Heise, Jana-Kristin and Jaskulski, Stefanie and
Karch, André and Keil, Thomas and Kiekert, Jasmin and
Krist, Lilian and Koch-Gallenkamp, Lena and Kuß, Oliver and
Lange, Berit and Leitzmann, Michael and Massag, Janka and
Meinke-Franze, Claudia and Mikolajczyk, Rafael and Obi,
Nadia and Peters, Annette and Pischon, Tobias and
Schikowski, Tamara and Schmidt, Börge and Schmidt, Carsten
Oliver and Schulze, Matthias and Velásquez, Ilais Moreno
and Wirkner, Kerstin},
title = {{D}epression and anxiety symptoms in internally migrated
women and men after the {G}erman unification: {B}aseline
results from the {G}erman {N}ational {C}ohort {S}tudy
({NAKO}).},
journal = {Journal of migration and health},
volume = {13},
issn = {2666-6235},
address = {[Amsterdam]},
publisher = {Elsevier Ltd.},
reportid = {DZNE-2026-00311},
pages = {100403},
year = {2026},
abstract = {Internal migration is a special case in Germany, with its
history of two formerly divided and re-unified states. In
this study, we examined mental health of women and men who
migrated internally after the German reunification and
compared them with each other and with the non-migrated
population in Eastern and Western Germany.Baseline data of
161,795 participants (49.9 $\%$ women; internal migrants
East-West = 7160 [4.4 $\%]$ and West-East = 3966 [2.5 $\%])$
from the population-based German National Cohort were used.
Internal migration was measured using information on
previous (1988) and current residency. To assess mental
health (i.e., current depression and anxiety symptoms), the
Depression Module of the Patient Health Questionnaire
(PHQ-9) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Symptoms Scale
(GAD-7) were applied. Group differences were assessed using
analyses of covariance and Tukey's Tests. Strengths of
effects were tested using omega squared.Significant
differences in levels of current depression and anxiety
symptoms between the four groups were found for both women
and men, but effect sizes were extremely small (ω² ≈
0.000-0.002). East-West migrants reported slightly lower
current depression symptoms (adj. M women = 4.00, adj. M men
= 3.17) than West-East migrants (adj. M women = 4.48, adj. M
men = 3.69). For East-West migrated men the same was found
for anxiety symptoms (adj. M = 2.52 versus adj. M = 2.96).
Mental health of internal migrants was not better compared
to their non-migrated counterparts.Subgroup analyses
revealed group differences to depend on sex, but show
negligible effect sizes, with internal migration only
explaining less than 0.2 $\%$ of the variance for depression
and anxiety symptoms. Internal migration alone is thus no
substantial factor in explaining mental health differences.
Future studies should use longitudinal data to determine
temporal associations between internal migration and mental
health.},
keywords = {Depression and anxiety symptoms (Other) / German migrants
(Other) / German unification (Other) / Internal migration
(Other) / Mental health (Other) / NAKO (Other)},
ddc = {610},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:41883695},
pmc = {pmc:PMC13010428},
doi = {10.1016/j.jmh.2026.100403},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/285775},
}