% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Dichter:137330,
author = {Dichter, Martin and Schwab, Christian G G and Meyer,
Gabriele and Bartholomeyczik, Sabine and Dortmann, Olga and
Halek, Margareta},
title = {{M}easuring the quality of life in mild to very severe
dementia: testing the inter-rater and intra-rater
reliability of the {G}erman version of the {QUALIDEM}.},
journal = {International psychogeriatrics},
volume = {26},
number = {5},
issn = {1041-6102},
address = {Cambridge},
publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
reportid = {DZNE-2020-03652},
pages = {825-836},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Quality of life (Qol) is an increasingly used outcome
measure in dementia research. The QUALIDEM is a
dementia-specific and proxy-rated Qol instrument. We aimed
to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in
residents with dementia in German nursing homes.The QUALIDEM
consists of nine subscales that were applied to a sample of
108 people with mild to severe dementia and six consecutive
subscales that were applied to a sample of 53 people with
very severe dementia. The proxy raters were 49 registered
nurses and nursing assistants. Inter-rater and intra-rater
reliability scores were calculated on the subscale and item
level.None of the QUALIDEM subscales showed strong
inter-rater reliability based on the single-measure
Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for absolute
agreement ≥ 0.70. Based on the average-measure ICC for
four raters, eight subscales for people with mild to severe
dementia (care relationship, positive affect, negative
affect, restless tense behavior, social relations, social
isolation, feeling at home and having something to do) and
five subscales for very severe dementia (care relationship,
negative affect, restless tense behavior, social relations
and social isolation) yielded a strong inter-rater agreement
(ICC: 0.72-0.86). All of the QUALIDEM subscales, regardless
of dementia severity, showed strong intra-rater agreement.
The ICC values ranged between 0.70 and 0.79 for people with
mild to severe dementia and between 0.75 and 0.87 for people
with very severe dementia.This study demonstrated
insufficient inter-rater reliability and sufficient
intra-rater reliability for all subscales of both versions
of the German QUALIDEM. The degree of inter-rater
reliability can be improved by collaborative Qol rating by
more than one nurse. The development of a measurement manual
with accurate item definitions and a standardized education
program for proxy raters is recommended.},
keywords = {Aged / Consumer Behavior: statistics $\&$ numerical data /
Dementia: diagnosis / Dementia: epidemiology / Dementia:
psychology / Dementia: therapy / Female / Geriatric
Assessment: methods / Germany: epidemiology / Homes for the
Aged: standards / Humans / Long-Term Care: methods /
Long-Term Care: psychology / Long-Term Care: standards /
Male / Nursing Homes: standards / Outcome Assessment, Health
Care / Proxy: psychology / Proxy: statistics $\&$ numerical
data / Psychometrics: methods / Quality of Life /
Reproducibility of Results / Severity of Illness Index /
Surveys and Questionnaires},
cin = {AG Halek / AG Roes},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-2719)1610001 / I:(DE-2719)1610003},
pnm = {344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-344},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:24507554},
doi = {10.1017/S1041610214000052},
url = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/137330},
}