% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ferra:285031,
      author       = {Ferra, Fenia and Walde, Peggy and Daum, Marcel and Teipel,
                      Stefan and Drewelow, Eva and Biernetzky, Olga and Völlm,
                      Birgit},
      title        = {{A} systematic review of participatory research involving
                      forensic mental health patients.},
      journal      = {BMC psychiatry},
      volume       = {26},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1471-244X},
      address      = {London},
      publisher    = {BioMed Central},
      reportid     = {DZNE-2026-00156},
      pages        = {85},
      year         = {2026},
      abstract     = {There is currently limited information and guidance on
                      utilising participatory research within forensic mental
                      health settings. This systematic review aimed to explore the
                      use of participatory research within those settings,
                      identify helpful practices, barriers and challenges, as well
                      as explore the impact reported of participatory research in
                      research and knowledge production. Fourteen studies and
                      eleven other types of publications have been identified from
                      electronic databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Web Of
                      Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and ProQuest and
                      hand searches of academic journals. Thematic analysis was
                      used for synthesising data collected. Four themes were
                      identified: (1) Building equal relationships, (2) Speaking
                      the same language, (3) An involving system, (4) Impact for
                      all. Analysis showed that the use of participatory research
                      in such settings relies on human interaction and equal
                      co-production within commonly restrictive and coercive
                      environments. The complexity of participatory research is
                      also reflected in its reporting. A standardised (but also
                      flexible) model of reporting would be valuable for future
                      research. In addition to summarizing the findings of
                      research in this area, we have compiled a list of ‘active
                      ingredients’ for the successful use of participatory
                      research in forensic mental health settings.The online
                      version contains supplementary material available at
                      10.1186/s12888-026-07813-8.},
      keywords     = {Forensic mental health (Other) / Involvement (Other) /
                      Participatory research (Other) / Patient participation
                      (Other) / Secure hospitals (Other)},
      cin          = {AG Teipel},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-2719)1510100},
      pnm          = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:41578237},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC12849659},
      doi          = {10.1186/s12888-026-07813-8},
      url          = {https://pub.dzne.de/record/285031},
}