Journal Article DZNE-2020-00359

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Enrichment designs using placebo nonresponders.

 ;

2020
Wiley New York, NY

Pharmaceutical statistics 19(3), 303-314 () [10.1002/pst.1992]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Enrichment designs that select placebo nonresponders have gained much attention during the last years in areas with high placebo response rates, eg, in depression. Proposals were made that re-randomize patients who did not respond to placebo during a first study phase as the sequential parallel design (SPD). This design uses in a second phase an enriched patient population where the treatment effect is expected to be more pronounced. This may be problematic if an effect in the overall population is claimed. Proposals were made to combine the treatment effects in the overall population from study phase 1 and the enriched population from study phase 2, alleviating but not solving the issue of a potential selection bias. This paper shows how this bias corresponding to the effect difference between the overall population and the enriched population depends on the variability of a potential subject-by-treatment interaction. Sample sizes are given, which lead to a significant result in the combining test with a given probability if actually the average effect in the overall population is zero. If, on the other hand, no subject-by-treatment interaction is given, the enrichment is shown to be inefficient. We conclude that enrichment designs using placebo nonresponders are not able to claim a positive average effect in the overall population if a subject-by-treatment interaction cannot be excluded. It cannot be used to demonstrate positive efficacy in the overall population in a pivotal phase III trial but may be used in early phases to demonstrate varying treatment effects between patients.

Keyword(s): Data Interpretation, Statistical (MeSH) ; Double-Blind Method (MeSH) ; Humans (MeSH) ; Models, Statistical (MeSH) ; Placebo Effect (MeSH) ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic: statistics & numerical data (MeSH) ; Research Design: statistics & numerical data (MeSH) ; Treatment Outcome (MeSH)

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Pharmacoepidemiology in Neurodegenerative Disorders (AG Hänisch ; AG Hänisch)
Research Program(s):
  1. 345 - Population Studies and Genetics (POF3-345) (POF3-345)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ; OpenAccess ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; DEAL Wiley ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > BN DZNE > BN DZNE-AG Hänisch
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2020-07-10, last modified 2024-03-21


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)