Journal Article

DZNE-2022-00437

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png What's the cut-point?: a systematic investigation of tau PET thresholding methods.

Weigand, A. J. ; Maaß, A.DZNE* ; Eglit, G. L. ; Bondi, M. W.

2022
BioMed Central London

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1186/s13195-022-00986-w

Abstract: Tau positron emission tomography (PET) is increasing in popularity for biomarker characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD), and recent frameworks rely on tau PET cut-points to stage individuals along the AD continuum. Given the lack of standardization in tau PET thresholding methods, this study sought to systematically canvass and characterize existing studies that have derived tau PET cut-points and then directly assess different methods of tau PET thresholding in terms of their concurrent validity.First, a literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify studies of AD and related clinical phenotypes that used the Flortaucipir (AV-1451) tau PET tracer to derive a binary cut-point for tau positivity. Of 540 articles screened and 47 full-texts reviewed, 23 cohort studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 6536 participants. Second, we derived and compared tau PET cut-points in a 2 × 2 × 2 design that systematically varied region (temporal meta-ROI and entorhinal cortex), analytic method (receiver operating characteristics and 2 standard deviations above comparison group), and criterion/comparison variable (amyloid-beta negative cognitively unimpaired or cognitively unimpaired only) using a sample of 453 older adults from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.For the systematic review, notable variability in sample characteristics, preprocessing methods, region of interest, and analytic approach were observed, which were accompanied by discrepancy in proposed tau PET cut points. The empirical follow-up indicated the cut-point derived based on 2 standard deviations above a either comparison group in either ROI best differentiated tau positive and negative groups on cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and delayed memory performance.Given the impact of discrepant thresholds on tau positivity rates, biomarker staging, and eligibility for future clinical treatment trials, recommendations are offered to select cut-point derivations based on the unique goals and priorities of different studies.

Keyword(s): Aged (MeSH) ; Alzheimer Disease: genetics (MeSH) ; Amyloid beta-Peptides (MeSH) ; Cognitive Dysfunction (MeSH) ; Humans (MeSH) ; Neuroimaging (MeSH) ; Positron-Emission Tomography: methods (MeSH) ; tau Proteins: cerebrospinal fluid (MeSH) ; Alzheimer’s disease ; Methods ; Positron emission tomography ; Review ; Tau ; Amyloid beta-Peptides ; tau Proteins

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Multimodales Neuroimaging (AG Maaß)

Research Program(s):

1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Appears in the scientific report 2022

---

Database coverage:
; ; ; ; Article Processing Charges ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; DOAJ Seal ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection

---