Journal Article DZNE-2026-00420

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Minimum important slowing of disease progression as determined by the ALS functional rating scale - a survey of patient expectations toward disease-modifying drugs in ALS.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2026
Taylor Francis Group Abingdon

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration 27(3-4), 457 - 468 () [10.1080/21678421.2026.2615117]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Objective: To define the minimum important slowing (MIS) of ALS progression that patients would expect from disease-modifying drug treatment in ALS. Methods: In a survey of ALS patients, the MIS in ALS progression (change in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, ALSFRS-R) was assessed by asking: 'At what point of slowing of ALS, as determined by the ALSFRS-R, do you consider a drug to be important?' Data were collected during clinic visits or remotely via the ALS App. Participants were differentiated in the prognostic groups of slower (<0.5), intermediate (≥0.5 and ≤1.0), or faster (>1.0) ALS progression (ALSPR; ALSFRS-R/month). Results: Of 522 participants (ALS App, n = 397; clinic, n = 125), 395 (75.7%) completed the survey, while 127 (24.3%) selected the option 'cannot estimate'. The distribution of MIS was as follows: modest slowing of ALS progression (5% and 10% slowing, n = 146 patients, 36.9%), moderate slowing (20%, 30%, and 40% slowing, n = 135, 34.2%), and major slowing (≥50% slowing, n = 114, 28.9%). Median MIS was 20% (IQR 10-50%). Patients with faster ALSPR more frequently assessed a major slowing as the MIS (n = 18, 36.0%) compared to those with slower ALSPR (n = 54, 25.2%). Conclusion: A considerable number of participants viewed a modest slowing in ALS progression as the MIS, followed closely by preferences for moderate and major slowing. Expectations varied according to patients' individual ALS progression. These insights may inform the design of future clinical trials in ALS. Study limitations include potential selection and response biases, as well as the predominantly remote digital assessment.

Keyword(s): Humans (MeSH) ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: drug therapy (MeSH) ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: psychology (MeSH) ; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: diagnosis (MeSH) ; Disease Progression (MeSH) ; Male (MeSH) ; Female (MeSH) ; Middle Aged (MeSH) ; Aged (MeSH) ; Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH) ; Adult (MeSH) ; ALS functional rating scale ; ALS progression ; ALSFRS-R ; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ; minimum important slowing

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Clinical Neuroimaging (AG Radbruch)
  2. Clinical Research Coordination (Clinical Research (Bonn))
  3. Clinical Research (Munich) (Clinical Research (Munich))
Research Program(s):
  1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Appears in the scientific report 2026
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; OpenAccess ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Institute Collections > BN DZNE > BN DZNE-Clinical Research (Bonn)
Institute Collections > M DZNE > M DZNE-Clinical Research (Munich)
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > BN DZNE > BN DZNE-AG Radbruch
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2026-04-23, last modified 2026-05-04


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)