Journal Article DZNE-2026-00954

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Diagnostic accuracy of a self-administered digital cognitive test battery for differentiating early Alzheimer's disease from controls.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2026
Steinkopff Darmstadt

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 276(7), 3835 - 3846 () [10.1007/s00406-026-02347-2]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Paper-pencil assessments face limitations in accessibility, lengthy administration, and interrater reliability. Digital tools may overcome these by offering user-friendly, non-verbal, and scalable assessments. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of BraincheX, a novel digital test battery focused on accessibility and usability, by comparing its subtest performance to CERAD-Plus equivalents.Fifty-six participants with early AD and amyloid negative cognitively healthy controls were recruited from the LMU hospital memory clinic. Diagnostic groups were defined by amyloid positivity and clinical expert consensus according to the IWG-2 criteria. Participants completed the BraincheX digital battery and CERAD-Plus. BraincheX total score was calculated by summing standardized subtest scores. Data were analyzed using ROC analysis and the Youden Index. Correlations between subtests were examined, and group differences analyzed via ANOVA.ROC analysis revealed strong diagnostic accuracy for the BraincheX total score in differentiating between early AD and controls (AUC = 0.86; optimal cut-off = - 1.51), with high sensitivity of 89.7% and moderate specificity of 68.0%. BraincheX total scores correlated with CERAD total scores (r = .73, p < .001). BraincheX demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84). ANOVA confirmed significant group differences across all BraincheX subtests (p < .01). Individual subtests showed strong correlations with CERAD-Plus equivalents.Findings suggest BraincheX as a promising, accessible digital screening tool for cognitive decline, offering automated scoring, immediate feedback, and reduced examiner bias. Future research is required to validate BraincheX in larger and more diverse populations and to establish BraincheX's clinical applicability.This analysis was conducted within the framework of the prospectively registered German SCD-Q validation study (NCT06711952). The registered study protocol included digital cognitive testing as part of the assessment protocol. The present manuscript reports a secondary analysis focusing on the diagnostic performance of BraincheX.

Keyword(s): Humans (MeSH) ; Alzheimer Disease: diagnosis (MeSH) ; Female (MeSH) ; Male (MeSH) ; Neuropsychological Tests: standards (MeSH) ; Aged (MeSH) ; Middle Aged (MeSH) ; Sensitivity and Specificity (MeSH) ; Reproducibility of Results (MeSH) ; Aged, 80 and over (MeSH) ; Cognitive Dysfunction: diagnosis (MeSH) ; Early Diagnosis (MeSH) ; Psychometrics: instrumentation (MeSH) ; Psychometrics: standards (MeSH) ; Cognitive Impairment ; Digital cognitive assessment ; Early Alzheimer's disease ; Early Detection ; Self-administered testing

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Vascular Cognitive Impairment & Post-Stroke Dementia (AG Dichgans)
Research Program(s):
  1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Database coverage:
Medline ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; DEAL Springer ; DEAL Springer ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > M DZNE > M DZNE-AG Dichgans
Documents in Process
Public records
In process

 Record created 2026-09-11, last modified 2026-09-11


Restricted:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)