Journal Article DZNE-2020-06080

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
A Modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Predicts Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Better Than Executive Function Tests.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2018
Frontiers Research Foundation Lausanne

Frontiers in aging neuroscience 10, 11 () [10.3389/fnagi.2018.00011]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is characterized by deep alterations in behavior and personality. Although revised diagnostic criteria agree for executive dysfunction as most characteristic, impairments in social cognition are also suggested. The study aimed at identifying those neuropsychological and behavioral parameters best discriminating between bvFTD and healthy controls. Eighty six patients were diagnosed with possible or probable bvFTD according to Rascovsky et al. (2011) and compared with 43 healthy age-matched controls. Neuropsychological performance was assessed with a modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), Stroop task, Trail Making Test (TMT), Hamasch-Five-Point Test (H5PT), and semantic and phonemic verbal fluency tasks. Behavior was assessed with the Apathy Evaluation Scale, Frontal Systems Behavioral Scale, and Bayer Activities of Daily Living Scale. Each test's discriminatory power was investigated by Receiver Operating Characteristic curves calculating the area under the curve (AUC). bvFTD patients performed significantly worse than healthy controls in all neuropsychological tests. Discriminatory power (AUC) was highest in behavioral questionnaires, high in verbal fluency tasks and the RMET, and lower in executive function tests such as the Stroop task, TMT and H5PT. As fluency tasks depend on several cognitive functions, not only executive functions, results suggest that the RMET discriminated better between bvFTD and control subjects than other executive tests. Social cognition should be incorporated into diagnostic criteria for bvFTD in the future, such as in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11, as already suggested in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM)-5.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Patient studies cologne (AG Jessen)
  2. Clinical Dementia Research Bonn (Clinical Dementia Research Bonn)
Research Program(s):
  1. 344 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF3-344) (POF3-344)

Appears in the scientific report 2018
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; BIOSIS Previews ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; DOAJ Seal ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > BN DZNE > BN DZNE-AG Schneider
Institute Collections > BN DZNE > BN DZNE-AG Jessen
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2020-02-18, last modified 2024-03-21