Journal Article

DZNE-2022-00007

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png The impact of participatory dementia research on researchers: A systematic review.

Kowe, A. (First author)Extern* ; Panjaitan, H.DZNE* ; Klein, O. A.DZNE* ; Boccardi, M.DZNE* ; Roes, M.DZNE* ; Teupen, S.DZNE* ; Teipel, S. (Last author)DZNE*

2022
Sage Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1177/14713012211067020

Abstract: Participatory approaches are increasingly required and used in research. In this review, we examined the impact (benefits and disadvantages) of participatory dementia research on researchers as potential key actors to sustainably implement the participatory approach. Our aim was to provide information on how the participatory process could be improved. We conducted a systematic literature review covering the Cochrane Library, PsycNet, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria for publications were as follows: research (1) involving people with dementia as co-researchers, (2) including a description or discussion of the impact of participatory research for researchers, (3) published between 2000 and 2020, and (4) in English. We performed a quality assessment of the included publications. Our final review included nine publications; three categorized as high quality, five as medium quality, and one as low quality. Four of the publications categorized as high or medium quality implemented participation at the level of partnership, and two publications implemented participation at the level of delegated power. The beneficial impact of participatory dementia research on researchers consisted of an increased understanding of people with dementia that widened researchers' theoretical knowledge and perspectives and increased their competence in working with people with dementia. Disadvantages comprised the required additional effort and time as well as the difficulty of establishing a balanced relationship between researchers and co-researchers. Disadvantages may result from the lack of a definition and structure of participatory research and a lack of training on both sides. More well-designed and transparent methods of evaluating participatory research projects are needed.

Keyword(s): Dementia (MeSH) ; Humans (MeSH) ; co-research ; dementia ; impact ; neurocognitive disorders ; neurodegenerative disorders ; participatory research ; patient and public involvement ; systematic review

---

Contributing Institute(s):

1. Clinical Dementia Research (Rostock /Greifswald) (AG Teipel)
2. Implementation Neuroscience (AG Boccardi)
3. Implementation Science & Person-Centered Dementia Care (AG Roes)
4. Methods in Health Care Research (AG Teupen)

Research Program(s):

1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Appears in the scientific report 2022

---

Database coverage:
; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; National-Konsortium ; SCOPUS ; Social Sciences Citation Index

---