Journal Article DZNE-2022-00305

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Divergence Between Informant and Self-Ratings of Activities of Daily Living Impairments in Parkinson's Disease.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2022
Frontiers Research Foundation Lausanne

Frontiers in aging neuroscience 14, 838674 () [10.3389/fnagi.2022.838674]

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: To examine the agreement between self- and informant-reported activities of daily living (ADL) deficits in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients, and to examine factors influencing ADL ratings.In PD, the loss of functional independence is an important outcome of disease progression. The valid assessment of ADL function in PD is essential, but it is unclear to what extent informants' and patients' perceptions of their daily functions concur, and how other factors may influence both ratings.Data of 150 PD patients who underwent cognitive and motor testing, as well as their informants were analyzed. The 10-item Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), completed separately by patients (FAQ-S) and their informants (FAQ-I), assessed ADL function. Weighted κ statistics summarized level of agreement, and a discrepancy score (FAQ-I - FAQ-S) quantified agreement. Correlation analyses between FAQ total scores, patient and informant characteristics, and cognitive scores were conducted, with post hoc regressions to determine the associations between both FAQ scores and cognition, independent of patient characteristics.The sample included 87 patients with normal cognition, 50 with mild cognitive impairment, and 13 with dementia. Overall, there was fair to moderate agreement between patients and informants on individual FAQ items (0.27 ≤ κ ≤ 0.61, p < 0.004), with greater discrepancies with increasing cognitive impairment. Patients' age, motor severity, non-motor burden, and depression also affected both ratings (0.27 ≤ r ≤ 0.50, p < 0.001), with motor severity showing the greatest influence on both ratings. Both the FAQ-I and FAQ-S were correlated with almost all cognitive domains. Post hoc regression analyses controlling for patient characteristics showed that the attention domain was a significant predictor of both the FAQ-S and FAQ-I scores, and memory was also a significant predictor of the FAQ-I score. Only 29.3% of patients agreed perfectly with informants on the FAQ total score, with informants most commonly rating ADL impairments as more severe than patients.Patient and informant ratings of ADL function using FAQ items showed moderate agreement, with only few items reaching substantial agreement. Ratings of both were associated with patient cognitive status, but also other characteristics. In addition to patient and informant reports, objective measures are needed to accurately classify ADL deficits in PD.

Keyword(s): Functional Activities Questionnaire ; Parkinson’s Disease ; activities of daily living ; caregiver ; cognition ; informant-ratings ; self-ratings

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Core ICRU (Core ICRU)
  2. Parkinson Genetics (AG Gasser)
  3. Ext Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (Ext UKT)
Research Program(s):
  1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Appears in the scientific report 2022
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; Article Processing Charges ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; DOAJ Seal ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > TÜ DZNE > TÜ DZNE-AG Gasser
Institute Collections > TÜ DZNE > TÜ DZNE-Ext UKT
Institute Collections > TÜ DZNE > TÜ DZNE-ICRU
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2022-04-08, last modified 2024-07-22


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext by Pubmed Central
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)