Journal Article DZNE-2022-01395

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Development of a Quantitative Instrument to Elicit Patient Preferences for Person-Centered Dementia Care Stage 1: A Formative Qualitative Study to Identify Patient Relevant Criteria for Experimental Design of an Analytic Hierarchy Process.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2022
MDPI AG Basel

International journal of environmental research and public health 19(13), 7629 () [10.3390/ijerph19137629] special issue: "Advances in Integrated Care Models"

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Background: Person-centered care (PCC) requires knowledge about patient preferences. This formative qualitative study aimed to identify (sub)criteria of PCC for the design of a quantitative, choice-based instrument to elicit patient preferences for person-centered dementia care. Method: Interviews were conducted with n = 2 dementia care managers, n = 10 People living with Dementia (PlwD), and n = 3 caregivers (CGs), which followed a semi-structured interview guide including a card game with PCC criteria identified from the literature. Criteria cards were shown to explore the PlwD's conception. PlwD were asked to rank the cards to identify patient-relevant criteria of PCC. Audios were verbatim-transcribed and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Card game results were coded on a 10-point-scale, and sums and means for criteria were calculated. Results: Six criteria with two sub-criteria emerged from the analysis; social relationships (indirect contact, direct contact), cognitive training (passive, active), organization of care (decentralized structures and no shared decision making, centralized structures and shared decision making), assistance with daily activities (professional, family member), characteristics of care professionals (empathy, education and work experience) and physical activities (alone, group). Dementia-sensitive wording and balance between comprehensibility vs. completeness of the (sub)criteria emerged as additional themes. Conclusions: Our formative study provides initial data about patient-relevant criteria of PCC to design a quantitative patient preference instrument. Future research may want to consider the balance between (sub)criteria comprehensibility vs. completeness.

Keyword(s): Analytic Hierarchy Process (MeSH) ; Caregivers: psychology (MeSH) ; Dementia: psychology (MeSH) ; Dementia: therapy (MeSH) ; Humans (MeSH) ; Patient Preference (MeSH) ; Patient-Centered Care: methods (MeSH) ; Qualitative Research (MeSH) ; Research Design (MeSH) ; attributes ; dementia ; mild cognitive impairment ; patient participation ; patient preferences ; patient-centered care ; qualitative research

Classification:

Note: CC BY

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Translational Health Care Research (AG Hoffmann)
Research Program(s):
  1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Appears in the scientific report 2022
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; Article Processing Charges ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences ; DOAJ Seal ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Social Sciences Citation Index ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > ROS DZNE > ROS DZNE-AG Hoffmann
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2022-08-05, last modified 2024-03-06


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext by Pubmed Central
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)