Contribution to a conference proceedings/Contribution to a book DZNE-2025-01026

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Learning via Insight

 ;  ;  ;  ;

2020

Proceedings for the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Developing a Mind: Learning in Humans, Animals, and Machines, CogSci 2020
42nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Developing a Mind: Learning in Humans, Animals, and Machines, CogSci 2020, VirtualVirtual, 29 Jul 2020 - 1 Aug 20202020-07-292020-08-01
452 - 453 ()

Abstract: Problem solving can be understood as a very active learning strategy which is also being employed in education, even though the mechanisms behind it are poorly understood (Loyens, Kirschner, & Paas, 2012). Insight in problem solving is often heralded as a moment of blinding understanding which generates a great deal of motivation (Liljedahl, 2005). Research on insight focuses on these moments, examining the cognitive processes that lead to this feeling of sudden understanding alongside the solution, and on methods of eliciting these electrifying sensations reliably (e.g., Webb, Little, & Cropper, 2017). An important consideration in insight research is the considerable differences in operationalizations of “insight” between studies. For example, Mednick (1962) operationalised insight/creativity as the ability to solve a verbal association problem (the remote associates task, RAT), in which participants are presented with three remotely associated words, and are required to find a single fourth word that provides a common link between the three (e.g., cottage, blue, goat-cheese). If the words were already closely associated, it would not require creativity to find the missing link. Insight has therefore sometimes been operationalized as a sudden switch from a state of incomprehension, to a state of comprehension, which might be induced by presenting the solution (Auble et al., 1979; Webb et al., 2018). This definition has held for a long time, with substantial shifts in more recent years. Increasingly, the presence of a subjective ‘‘aha!’’ experience is considered necessary to interpret a solution to a problem as an insight (e.g., Bowden & Jung-Beeman, 2003). Finally, some researchers have proposed that insight does not necessarily include a state of incomprehension,but needs mental restructuring (Wills, Estow, Soraci, & Garcia, 2006).


Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Molecular biomarkers for predictive diagnostics of neurodegenerative diseases (AG Wiltfang)
Research Program(s):
  1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Events > Contributions to a conference proceedings
Document types > Books > Contribution to a book
Institute Collections > GÖ DZNE > GÖ DZNE-AG Wiltfang
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2025-09-02, last modified 2025-09-18


Restricted:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)