Journal Article DZNE-2024-00351

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Repetition Suppression Reveals Cue-specific Spatial Representations for Landmarks and Self-motion Cues in Human Retrosplenial Cortex.

 ;  ;

2024
Soc. Washington, DC

eNeuro 11(4), ENEURO.0294-23.2024 () [10.1523/ENEURO.0294-23.2024]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: The efficient use of various spatial cues within a setting is crucial for successful navigation. Two fundamental forms of spatial navigation, landmark-based and self-motion-based, engage distinct cognitive mechanisms. The question of whether these modes invoke shared or separate spatial representations in the brain remains unresolved. While nonhuman animal studies have yielded inconsistent results, human investigation is limited. In our previous work (Chen et al., 2019), we introduced a novel spatial navigation paradigm utilizing ultra-high field fMRI to explore neural coding of positional information. We found that different entorhinal subregions in the right hemisphere encode positional information for landmarks and self-motion cues. The present study tested the generalizability of our previous finding with a modified navigation paradigm. Although we did not replicate our previous finding in the entorhinal cortex, we identified adaptation-based allocentric positional codes for both cue types in the retrosplenial cortex (RSC), which were not confounded by the path to the spatial location. Crucially, the multi-voxel patterns of these spatial codes differed between the cue types, suggesting cue-specific positional coding. The parahippocampal cortex exhibited positional coding for self-motion cues, which was not dissociable from path length. Finally, the brain regions involved in successful navigation differed from our previous study, indicating overall distinct neural mechanisms recruited in our two studies. Taken together, the current findings demonstrate cue-specific allocentric positional coding in the human RSC in the same navigation task for the first time and that spatial representations in the brain are contingent on specific experimental conditions.

Keyword(s): Humans (MeSH) ; Animals (MeSH) ; Cues (MeSH) ; Gyrus Cinguli (MeSH) ; Entorhinal Cortex (MeSH) ; Brain (MeSH) ; Spatial Navigation (MeSH) ; Space Perception (MeSH) ; adaptation ; entorhinal cortex ; landmark ; path integration ; retrosplenial cortex ; spatial navigation

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Aging, Cognition and Technology (AG Wolbers)
Research Program(s):
  1. 353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) (POF4-353)

Appears in the scientific report 2024
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 ; DOAJ ; OpenAccess ; BIOSIS Previews ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; DOAJ Seal ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > MD DZNE > MD DZNE-AG Wolbers
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2024-04-08, last modified 2024-08-08


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext by Pubmed Central
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)