Journal Article DZNE-2023-00338

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Biomechanical Properties of Repair Cartilage Tissue Are Superior Following Microdrilling Compared to Microfracturing in Critical Size Cartilage Defects.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2023
IIAR Kapandriti, Attiki

In vivo 37(2), 565 - 573 () [10.21873/invivo.13115]

This record in other databases:    

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Common surgical treatment options for large focal chondral defects (FCDs) in the knee include microfracturing (MFX) and microdrilling (DRL). Despite numerous studies addressing MFX and DRL of FDCs, no in vivo study has focused on biomechanical analysis of repair cartilage tissue in critical size FCDs with different amounts of holes and penetration depths.Two round FCDs (d=6 mm) were created on the medial femoral condyle in 33 adult merino sheep. All 66 defects were randomly assigned to 1 control or 4 different study groups: 1) MFX1, 3 holes, 2 mm depth; 2) MFX2, 3 holes, 4 mm depth; 3) DRL1, 3 holes, 4 mm depth; and 4) DRL2, 6 holes, 4 mm depth. Animals were followed up for 1 year. Following euthanasia, quantitative optical analysis of defect filling was performed. Biomechanical properties were analysed with microindentation and calculation of the elastic modulus.Quantitative assessment of defect filling showed significantly better results in all treatment groups compared to untreated FCDs in the control group (p<0.001), with the best results for DRL2 (84.2% filling). The elastic modulus of repair cartilage tissue in the DRL1 and DRL2 groups was comparable to the adjacent native hyaline cartilage, while significantly inferior results were identified in both MFX groups (MFX1: p=0.002; MFX2: p<0.001).More defect filling and better biomechanical properties of the repair cartilage tissue were identified for DRL compared to MFX, with the best results for 6 holes and 4 mm of penetration depth. These findings are in contrast to the current clinical practice with MFX as the gold standard and suggest a clinical return to DRL.

Keyword(s): Animals (MeSH) ; Control Groups (MeSH) ; Cartilage (MeSH) ; DRL ; FCD ; Knee ; MFX ; cartilage ; defect ; drilling ; focal chondral defect ; microfracturing ; regeneration

Classification:

Note: CC BY-NC-ND

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Animal Facility (Mouse) (Animal Facility (Mouse) München)
Research Program(s):
  1. 352 - Disease Mechanisms (POF4-352) (POF4-352)

Appears in the scientific report 2023
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 ; OpenAccess ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Institute Collections > M DZNE > M DZNE-Mouse Facility (Munich)
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Full Text Collection
Public records
Publications Database

 Record created 2023-03-13, last modified 2023-10-04


OpenAccess:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
External link:
Download fulltextFulltext by Pubmed Central
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)